Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023–24 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Tottenham Hotspur F.C.. "Wait until there is significant news coverage" is the world upside down. If there are no sources now, then we cannot have an article now. Randykitty (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

2023–24 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another contested redirect/draft without any in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources. Case of WP:TOOSOON, but draftify is no longer an option.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete / restore redirect, TOOSOON as no SIGCOV yet. Spike &#39;em (talk) 13:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep: per User:Joseph2302 on Articles for deletion/2023–24 S.S.C. Napoli season "Wait until there is significant news coverage of this season e.g. once the 2022-23 season has ended, and there's some actual fixtures, transfers to report." A pre-season fixture for the next season has been announced, therefore there is sourced information on this season and there is coverage on it. There are four different sources on the page, all valid to the article. The article is reliably sourced and is nothing on there is CRYSTALBALL or TOOSOON. Mwiqdoh (talk) 16:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Where is the significant coverage? An announcement of a fixture is ROUTINE coverage, not significant. Spike &#39;em (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This seems like a complete misquote of what I said there, which is don't create articles WP:TOOSOON. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, let's break down whether your suggested criteria have been met:
 * there is significant news coverage of this season ❌
 * the 2022-23 season has ended ❌
 * some actual fixtures An insignificant pre-season friendly, sourced only to the club website, doesn't count to me
 * transfers to report ❌
 * All of the sources used are from the club / the league it plays in, so cannot be used to establish notability. Spike &#39;em (talk) 10:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - Per Mwiqdoh. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete / restore redirect, Fails GNG and NSEASONS. Might be too soon, but not now.  // Timothy :: talk  05:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Restore redirect for now, too early. GiantSnowman 15:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Restore redirect as per Spike's assessment above (based on one my comments at a previous AFD), the existence of one pre-season friendly match is not enough information to warrant an article this soon. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I prefer to keep the article, it was created too early, but whats the point in the faff when the article is needed. Other than that, talk about WP:BATTLEGROUND at, Careful mate! Govvy (talk) 16:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.