Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Philip Schofield affair scandal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

2023 Philip Schofield affair scandal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article was created with substantial portions directly copied without attribution from Philip Schofield. It's not clear that this needs its own page, as the relevant material is included in context on the Philip Schofield article. Given the recency of the article creation, it can be safely deleted without too much concern about external links or external search engines. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 08:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Events, Sexuality and gender,  and United Kingdom.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete An unnecessary and undue split from the subject's article. AusLondonder (talk) 11:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - As this is copied and the subject has an existing wikipedia article already. I can't think of any valid reason to keep it.Hkkingg (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is covered in context within the Phillip Schofield article, so this article is an unnecessary content fork. Don't see the need for an AtD here. Rupples (talk) 00:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.