Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Rolling Fork–Midnight–Silver City tornado


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 19:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

2023 Rolling Fork–Midnight–Silver City tornado

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This tornado isn't notable enough just yet. Plus, we barely have any information on the tornado's rating (since it's preliminary), and this article was created by the same guy who made the January 24 outbreak article which was sent to AfD. Poodle23 (talk) 15:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete — This was previously moved into mainspace very pre-mature. This was moved back into draftspace by myself on grounds that it was very much not ready for mainspace. The article creator added around 800 characters worth of formatting information (not much content), then moved it back into mainspace. At this point, draftification failed, so just a plain old delete on WP:CFORK grounds is the best option right now. Elijahandskip (talk) 15:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – Per Elijahandskip Undescribed (talk) 15:45, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – But not because it is from the same author as the Deer Park EF3 author. Reasoning explained by Elijahandskip. Mjeims (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Elijahandskip. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Just not ready yet Infinity (talk - contributions) 16:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – what nom and Elijahandskip just said. Tails   Wx  17:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – Too early. Maybe later, but not yet. Chess  Eric  18:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – No since in doing this now. United States Man (talk) 20:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Only two sources and seemingly more inexplicably concerned with retail store damage rather than fatalities. Needs a complete rewrite in draftspace.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete It's early for this article, we should wait till we get more info. Besides there's already a section in the article about the outbreak it was in, with almost the same info as this article. Plus, we're getting premin. info from the damage survey. Just Merge the article till we get more info to justify an article.--Halls4521 (talk) 00:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: I just wrote up the section for this tornado and I can tell you that there is no need for an article. Chess  Eric  23:23, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * There is also an RFC ongoing that the section might be too long. As for the article, redirect per WP:ATD. 98.116.45.220 (talk) 20:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * That has already been resolved. Chess  Eric  19:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.