Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Wests Tigers season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Despite being relisted twice no substantial discussion regarding the available sources took place. But clearly there is currently no consensus to delete the article. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

2023 Wests Tigers season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Contested redirect. Zero independent sources, but redirecting is no longer an option. Currently fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose: WP:NSEASONS qualifies this and almost every other NRL team season article nominated or draftified by this editor. Yes some teams have more active editors than others to ensure full WP:GNG compliance, but I fail to see the point of the back-and-forward nature of what's happening to a few different articles in the rugby league space. Storm machine (talk) 23:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

*Keep: adheres to WP:NSEASONS and there's more than enough presumed and significant coverage available for editors to expand upon the article in time using simple searches, aka WP:NEXISTS.Storm machine (talk) 06:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC) Striking second !vote by the same user. MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks non-routine coverage supporting that WP:GNG is met (WP:NSPORT doesn't automatically establish notability). MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Is clearly notable as a top-level professional team with plenty of coverage, see for example the numerous results on GNews just published in the last few days! BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: as noted in my struck out comment, WP:NEXISTS – there's more than enough presumed and significant coverage available for editors to expand upon the article in time using simple searches. Storm machine (talk) 22:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.