Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable plane crash. No famous people on board and nothing unusual or notable that would warrant an article on a light aircraft crash. Additionally, the details section is way too clunky, filled with too much information and mostly non-important information. It doesn't really meet Wikipedia:LASTING standards. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 11:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation,  and Florida.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment Two things: It is a little early to state that it has no lasting impact as it literally just happened. Also, the state of the details section has no relevance here as WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Alvaldi (talk) 12:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What I meant to say was that if the article does stay, the details section needs to be improved. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Aviationwikiflight, if the article remains it should be renamed. Why should the title be so specific as to the model of the aircraft, which is not the focus of this ONEEVENT. Also, please note Wikipedia is NOTNEWS. — Jacona (talk) 14:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * But if we were to assume that every GA plane that crashes could have lasting impacts, then wikipedia would be filled with dozens if not hundreds of GA accidents. These accidents happen most of the time without any lasting effects. 103.220.79.9 (talk) 00:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too soon, it can always be restored if it ends up being a notable. tedder (talk) 00:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTABILITY Pdubs.94 (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep for now and wait as the crash is a recent event (just happened a few days ago). The article might have been created too soon, we shouldn’t rush to delete articles per There is no deadline. 64.141.44.242 (talk) 03:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure, there is no deadline but like, an accident investigation lasts ranging from a few months to 2 years. The point is that, as 103.220.79.9 stated is that if we wait for the final report of every accident investigation involving light aircraft and it turns out that, like 1 year later, it doesn't lead to major changes, then wikipedia would be cluttered with plenty of Ga aviation accidents.
 * You said we shouldn't rush to delete articles but at the same time, we shouldn't rush to create articles without much factual information per Wikipedia:There is no deadline. As of right now, this place crash while tragic isn't notable enough to be on wikipedia Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment: It's premature to even say the crash was a result of engine failure. Loss of engine power could have been a result of fuel starvation (fuel selector on the wrong tank) not just an engine mechanical failure. The FAA has not yet even released a preliminary report. 192.55.55.54 (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment Has the crash been receiving continuous coverage since the crash or did it die down after two or three days? If it is still receiving significant coverage it might indicate that it will have a lasting impact (if not, we can always nominate it again after a year). But if the coverage died down after 2-3 days, then it is more of an indicator that it will not receiving continuous significant coverage in the long term. Alvaldi (talk) 15:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Major coverage stopped like 5-6 days ago. Local coverage has lasted until the 6th of February (3 days ago) and most of these articles contain the same information. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline#View_three:_Don't_postpone_dispute_resolutionJames.folsom (talk) 21:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Subject currently lacks the sustained coverage, is a failure of WP:NOTNEWS. Let&#39;srun (talk) 01:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.