Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Myanmar Air Force Shaanxi Y-8 crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

2024 Myanmar Air Force Shaanxi Y-8 crash

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Per WP:NOTNEWS. From what I've been able to find, the majority of sources are primary with a lack of/no reliable secondary sources. The event does not have in-depth nor continued coverage coverage. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, Myanmar,  and Mizoram. Shellwood (talk) 12:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. Which of the references is primary? And why would an incident in 2024 already have continued coverage? gidonb (talk) 23:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Are you talking about the references used in the article or published news articles outside the article?
 * Per WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, "Events that are only covered in sources published during or immediately after an event, without further analysis or discussion, are likely not suitable for an encyclopedia article." I've only been able to find news coverage dating from when the accident happened. Coverage of the accident only lasted 1-3 days. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 14:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * References are in the articles and sources are out there. My question was for the references. The continued coverage requirement is important, however, it takes time until media get back to an event. This one happened in 2024. gidonb (talk) 21:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Regarding the accident, pretty much all references are primary without any analysis of the event.
 * Per WP:NTEMP: "While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion, or new evidence may arise for articles previously deemed unsuitable. Thus, an article may be proposed for deletion months or even years after its creation, or recreated whenever new evidence supports its existence as a standalone article." Aviationwikiflight (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Nearly six months after the event, nobody's much interested, and there's no discernable reason why they should be. Also, military crashes have a higher bar to cross for notability than civilian ones. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Rosbif73 (talk) 09:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The most recent news i could find were from 1 day after the accident.
 * Scs52 (talk) 14:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.