Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Wyoming Republican presidential caucuses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to 2024 United States presidential election in Wyoming. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

2024 Wyoming Republican presidential caucuses

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Despite sources existing, there is no reason for this article to exist separate from 2024 United States presidential election in Wyoming. There it can be sufficiently covered in one sentence. Esolo5002 (talk) 00:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics,  and Wyoming.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge In uncontested race, results are easily and best covered in main article. Reywas92Talk 03:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Still has enough sources to maintain it's own article despite the single candidate. I would argue that some of the citations should be removed because they are not related to the primary. This would be 7, 8, 9, and maybe the sixth one. There are partially related to the race in Wyoming, but are more general for the overall election. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment - This brings up Articles for deletion/2024 Alaska Democratic presidential caucuses, where Biden is the only presidential candidate, and only 15 delegates. I don't necessarily have a strong opinion on any of them. But I do think there should be a guideline consistency in how these small caucuses are handled. I don't know that there is a guideline of any direction for these situations. — Maile  (talk) 03:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge Adds no value to WP as a teeny stub (WP:REDUNDANT). As Esolo5002 states, a trivial uncontested primary of this type can be easily covered in one sentence in the main article. Feels like people create these non-articles purely to check off the redlinks in Template:2024 Republican primaries, but many of those links just need to be a redirect to " United States presidential election in #Republican caucuses". 2024 Nebraska Republican presidential primary falls into the same category. I'd go as far as to say that being a section in the main article should be the default, with caucuses only getting a standalone article when there's some major controversy or it was a bigger/more heavily contested primary. Even minorly contested primaries like 2024 Washington Republican presidential primary (Trump vs. Haley) are really just a results box that could be as easily slotted into the main article. Hemmers (talk) 15:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Merge. There just aren't enough happenings to justify this article.--Mpen320 (talk) 23:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.