Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Republican National Convention


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

2028 Republican National Convention

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Should be deleted or draftified. WP:Toosoon SecretName101 (talk) 02:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. SecretName101 (talk) 02:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a clear cut WP:TOOSOON --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Obviously WP:TOOSOON. Sal2100 (talk) 16:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON. The Republicans haven't decided on location yet. — Maile (talk) 20:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @Maile66 I wouldn't say that site selection is cutoff point before which an article cannot be created, as we started articles for 2024 conventions before their locations were selected. However, now is simply not he time for a 2028 RNC article as there is nothing more than early speculation as to the location with miniscule coverage (without any actual major action towards bidding, or even the initiation of a bidding process), and the 2024 conventions are still more than a year away from happening themselves. Also, in retrospect, the 2024 convention articles were published at least maybe half a year too early (my bad). Should have waited until formal bidding was underway to move them out of the draft space so they'd have actual meat to their content. SecretName101 (talk) 04:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree, this is a clear-cut WP:TOOSOON case.TH1980 (talk) 02:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON is an essay and does not provide grounds for deletion. WP:CHRYSTAL, however, is policy and does provide grounds for deletion: while this is a certain future event, it is lacking in SIGCOV RS. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.