Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2030 United States census


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

2030 United States census

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It is too early to have an article about the next U.S. census with adequate sources beyond the three already in the article. We are not even half-way through the 2020s decade yet. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Social science and United States of America. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:48, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: Due to an error I have corrected in Special:Diff/1107260123, Twinkle did not actually list the nomination at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Social science. The nomination has now been listed there. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL, and only restore by the time it is about to be conducted. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 11:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Organization of this census is already underway since 2018; today I expanded the article and added further, specific references. --Fadesga (talk) 12:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:CRYSTAL is clear that "individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." There is no doubt that the 2030 Census is notable and that it will very likely take place as it is required by the U.S. Constitution.  The 2030 Census has already received WP:SIGCOV as demonstrated by sources added into the article by User:Fadesga. Carson Wentz (talk) 14:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:CRYSTAL it is almost certain to take place, and if it was cancelled then that would generate enough content and sources for notability still. Also as a large event in active planing this is not a trivial future event. KylieTastic (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.