Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2032 Summer Olympics (5th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And protect.  Sandstein  06:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

2032 Summer Olympics
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON, WP:CRYSTALBALL. And WP:SALT. Boleyn (talk) 19:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as in Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Already deleted four times.  Definitely needs some sodium chloride applied to the earth.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete – At this time, 2017 versus 2032. God knows I want to be here for it.  But WP:CRYSTALBALL is definitely appropriate.  Kudos to the editor that started the page (Nice Job).  We can certainly use your editing skills.  ShoesssS Talk 20:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Literally the only thing we know about the 2032 Games is they're going to air on NBC in the United States, or whatever form of television NBC is in 2032. We've got a foggy ball otherwise.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I saw somewhere recently that this would be up for re-creation now that the site for the 2028 olympic games had been settled, presumably so the bidding could be covered here. Sounds like an odd reason to me, and I can't remember where I saw this.  Can anyone else comment on our precedent for handling future olympic games? Jclemens (talk) 01:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research with no references. With referenced content, I would support the creation of Bids for the 2032 Summer Olympics.  The 2028 Olympics have been awarded, so this is the next cycle to be awarded. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 06:46, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The above arguments suggest this fails WP:CRYSTALBALL and at the moment there does not seem to be any serious discussion about bids making an article at this stage rather pointless and speculative. Dunarc (talk) 19:42, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT per WP:TOOSOON and the article being created and deleted 4 times already prior to this one....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as article appears to be pure speculation that countries bidding for the 2028 Summer Olympics before they decided to award that the same time as 2024 are now considering bidding for 2032 instead, of which there is no reliable source saying so. If there were any reliable sources discussing bids for 2032, I would support keeping this. But that's not the case. Smartyllama (talk) 17:17, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt until 2020 per above. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The 2028 article has existed since 2006. There will likely be reliably sourced information on 2032 prior to 2020. There isn't yet, so it should be deleted per my !vote above, but oppose salt. Smartyllama (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.