Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2040 Summer Olympics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-31 07:18Z 

2040 Summer Olympics

 * — (View AfD)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Holygroup 21:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing is known - what is the point? Regan123 21:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination; no useful information in this article.  J Di  talk 21:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete dumb. Danny Lilithborne 21:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for the nonsense about the Moon colonies and the assertion that Canada hosted the 2030 games. - Aagtbdfoua 22:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, ridiculous. Punkmorten 22:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN the "Bidding Considerations" section and delete Ludicrous, hilarious garbage. -- Kicking222 22:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense. If these games are hosted as stated I will then retract my comment.--Anthony.bradbury 22:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Premature. The Olympics do have some lead time, but not this long. FrozenPurpleCube 23:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, patent nonsense. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Not really patent nonsense since the article does make "sense" in a lingusitical term and it is perfectly possible to understand what the article is saying. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - and BJAODN the bidding section. Grutness...wha?  00:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would guess that people in 1906 thought there would be Olympic games in 1940, but there were not. We are in no better shape to make such predictions on 2040 in 2006. Event is too far off in the future for any verifiable information or well-founded speculation about these games. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * (To the closer) I see that the request to BJAODN a section of this has already been fulfilled, so no need to worry about it. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note that this article is because of this article. --  Zanimum 17:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ultrasonic Delete Ajuk 21:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You can't just vote. How about citing a reason? BishopTutu 21:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * sorry would of thought the reason was obvious! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajuk (talk • contribs)
 * Nope, and AfD is not a vote, it's a discussion. There's really no point to offering a remark without a reason.  FrozenPurpleCube 23:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Utterly useless. There isn't even any useful information about the article subject. BishopTutu 21:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL. Tonytypoon 01:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is pretty pointless. Elcda0 06:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: it seems it was created as a joke in response to this article: . In the comments someone admits to creating it. S Sepp 13:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Obviously a joke.  Andrwsc 01:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.