Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2046 FIFA World Cup (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

2046 FIFA World Cup
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Meaningless content, see also Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 21, Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 3, Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 3 and Articles for deletion/2046 FIFA World Cup, suggest salt Hhkohh (talk) 15:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Same as the 2042 article, WP:NotJustYet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubizuva (talk • contribs) 15:16, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT to prevent overzealous editors creating it. Far too early. GiantSnowman 15:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP: TOOSOON. Vorbee (talk) 15:36, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Made me chuckle. Fails WP:BALL - FIFA might not exist by then.Icewhiz (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:TOOSOON, way too early for this page to exist. 21.colinthompson (talk) 15:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No information on it, yet. (Same !vote as in Articles for deletion/2042 FIFA World Cup) --MuZemike 18:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:TOOSOON Qaei     &#9742;  19:23, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete like the 2042 page, this is WP:TOOSOON. Tillerh11 (talk) 19:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete As I said on the 1st nomination and with other pages like this, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON. SemiHypercube (talk) 18:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that it's simply too soon. I would also like to explicitly recommend against this becoming a redirect after deletion since before this was converted into a one sentence article it was at WP:RFD where it was clearing trending towards deletion and it would be a complete waste of time to wait 7 days to reach that conclusion again.--76.65.40.44 (talk) 21:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt, blatant case of WP:TOOSOON, subject fails WP:GNG outside un-notable routine mentions. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, waaayyy tooooo soooon, i know WP editors and readers are fanatical about football but this is going a bit far:))Coolabahapple (talk) 09:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:15, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT per WP:CRYSTAL and plain common sense. — Jkudlick &#x2693; t &#x2693; c &#x2693; s 10:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:33, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else. There is no way the article could have any meaningful content for about 20 years -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:20, 7 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.