Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2060


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2060s. Sandstein (talk) 06:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

2060

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This year is too far in the future to have an article on Wikipedia. Note that we don't have articles for the other years in the 2060s decade, e.g. 2061, 2062, 2065, 2069. RightGot (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Redirect to 2060s, to sit alongside the other examples given. -- Roleplayer (talk) 20:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2060s per nomination and Roleplayer. Some content may need to be merged. -- saberwyn 22:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect seems like a good idea in this case. Maybe in another fifty years someone can write an article with more content. Mandsford (talk) 22:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to 2060s. (Sorry, nominator, but deletion is problematic if we are to include the relatively well-sourced data in the target, so Redirect is not precisely correct.)  &mdash; Arthur Rubin  (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to 2060s per Arthur.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 07:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect per Roleplayer and Arthur. Atyndall93  |  talk  11:23, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Definitely merge and redirect to 2060s. That kind of a decade article has good leeway for adding specific details about each year. Merging and then redirecting is the best way to consolidate the info, IMO. -- Jamie  S93  13:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to 2060s as above. We can recreate this article in about forty years or so =)  Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.