Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of Jody Watley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 02:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of Jody Watley

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources besides a short Allmusic review. Album didn't chart, wasn't certified, didn't include any new material. Utterly fails all notability criteria for albums. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - It has received a basic review from AllMusic and in my opinion that confers a basic amount of notability for inclusion in this encyclopedic project. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 19:23, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Delete This is not an original work, which would be notable. I think the standards of notability for a mere repackaging would be higher than a mention at allmusic or any other website, as would be for any other class of material. The review in allmusic just   amounts to a track listing--perhaps because there is nothing to review--the list of songs tells everything necessary or possible to be said. If NOTDIRECTORY has a meaning, it applies to such catalog information. Allmusic is a RS for factual information, not notability.  DGG ( talk ) 15:59, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Inclusion in allmusic, even a review there, does not indicate notability as the purpose of that site is to be exhaustive. Wickedjacob (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.