Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21,000 royal cubits

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 06:40, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

21,000 royal cubits and 100 Royal cubits
Article content is identical to Itrw. Delete. Ken talk 04:58, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * I took the liberty of adding a second article, also identical to Itrw. DS1953 06:08, August 13, 2005 (UTC)


 * I don't mind. I didn't look at that article because of the title difference. The editor currently making major modifications in the weights and measures articles hasn't, until now, been adding multiple identical articles, so I didn't think to look at this one. I agree that it should be deleted too... Ken talk 12:49, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is just a number, not an article,  Don't redirect. -- DS1953 06:00, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, an article on Royal cubits may be useful, but this is a useless copy of Itrw with not-often-searched name. - Mgm|(talk) 09:43, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not useful. -- Egil 10:29, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as only the opening sentence relates to the article's titles. -- &lt; drini | &part;drini &gt; 01:46, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless.  Gene Nygaard 02:24, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.