Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21 (comics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

21 (comics)
Delete no assertion of notability. Ruby 14:22, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Keep. Article (accurately) asserts that title is published by a major North American comics publisher, which satisfies notability requirement. Monicasdude 15:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not AfD'ing the publisher, I'm nominating this title. Ruby 15:18, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Response: Why do you think the article doesn't include an assertion of notability? Can you cite another title from another major NA publisher that's been deleted as non-notable? Monicasdude 17:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think I'm being sufficiently clear. They could be the foremost comic publisher in all of human history, and they could have a perfect history of publishing only notable comics, but this article does not assert this comic's notability. Ruby 19:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * You're missing my point entirely. Being published by the major publisher is sufficient to demonstrate notability, and the article reports that fact. Meets the 5,000-copy standard for publication generally, too. Monicasdude 19:56, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 15:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Monicasdude. Not deletable as nn. Adrian Lamo ·  (talk)  · (mail) · 20:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. *drew 10:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. nerdcruft. incog 17:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as random comic. I accept that it's published by a notable publisher, so I'm not opposed to a slight merge/redirect. Stifle 12:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 20:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.