Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21 Singles

21 Singles was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. 7 votes to keep, 3 votes to delete. Postdlf 14:39, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

21 Singles
Useless out of context. Deb 11:51, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Oho, it's our day for track-listing pages. Delete, then. &#8212; Bill 12:17, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, all it needs is more info. I added whose album it is. Lachatdelarue [[User talk:Lachatdelarue|(talk)]] 13:09, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --Improv 15:44, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, its a singles collection by a very influential band.  It is most certianly notable, and has very much potential to become encyclopedic.  I've given it a bit of an expansion.   &mdash; siro  &chi;  o  23:45, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Gamaliel 05:29, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Radman1 00:35, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, esp after Siroxo's expansion. Key45 21:07, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Intrigue 00:05, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep I am becoming somewhat disturbed at the level of deletionism occurring for what I think are worthy articles. There little, if any, harm in keeping interesting and esoteric material on Wikipedia.  If you do not want to know about this topic then you do not search for it.  However, if it is kept it will be here for people who do want to know about it.  Also be careful you do not suffer from Academic Standards Disease :o) --ShaunMacPherson 18:48, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.