Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21st (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice towards recreation if reliable sources emerge in the future. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

21st (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film, is not covered in reliable sources, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 11:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 15:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 15:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I have seen a lot of messy Indian movie articles recently, and I can't help wondering why they always have so horrid sources that proving their notability is almost impossible... I guess it is just better to delete them until better sources surface. Ceosad (talk) 16:15, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Imagine how much smaller Wikipedia would be if all unimproved or messy articles were simply deleted out of hand. Would have made my own meager efforts to fix things kind of pointless. LOL  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: "21st Movie" "Viswa Kamal" "Naveen Maryada" "Jaishankar Chigurula"


 * Temporary delete per simply being TOO SOON. This topic It is NOT unsourcable, but all I have found is coverage of the film's audio launch... an event which usually precedes Indian films by a few months. Allow back once we have conformation of filming having actually begun.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Looks like you somehow managed to reach the almost same conclusion I did. If I were here to destroy articles plainly because they are bad, I would have never saved the Kingdom of Ce. Just compare it to its earlier revision. I am currently in progress of saving two Indian women related articles which were recently PRODded for being badly referenced. I am no stranger for saving messy articles, even though your actions have been much more commendable. My original offhand remark was about the weird mentality these Indian articles suffer from, as they tend to come in existence right before any easily reachable in-depth sources blossom. So yes, WP:NOT YET (films) was the real problem. Temporary deletion is a good solution here. Ceosad (talk) 03:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.