Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21st Century Skills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  04:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

21st Century Skills

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertising, Does not meet WP:NOTE or WP:NOTADVERTISING FlatOut 14:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ( t  •  c ) 01:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  01:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete per nom. Plenty about the string "21st Century Skills" under GScholar, but this particular work does not stand out in reviews. Also, looks frightfully like WP:COPYVIO.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * * Comment Agreed that WP:COPYVIO is an issues. The book's author created the page (see discussion) and believed they could override WP:COPYVIO. FlatOut 00:10, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.