Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21st December, 2012


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete for copying non-free content, as below, by RHaworth. Uncle G (talk) 20:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

21st December, 2012

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CFORK

Pretty much everything in this article is already covered in the page 2012 phenomenon. Mikeo34 (talk) 16:40, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not only is it largely a duplicate of 2012 phenomenon, but it's all uncited and I have serious doubts about the truths of some statements. It reads like someone's copied it from a sensationalistic website. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:23, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. It's sort of copyvio from the guy's own blog. Parts of it, anyway. It's his own stuff, but I'll tag it just so it can die a quick death.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 19:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I've left him a message about some of the issues in here. I think he meant well, but is just new. I proposed that if he's interested in contributing to the 2012 Phenomenon article, that he start on the talk page until he gets a little more familiar with the tone/style for Wikipedia. It can be a big writing style change for newer users, or at least it was for me when I first started editing.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.