Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/220 Oak Street Tenants Association (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. --Durin 17:32, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

220 Oak Street Tenants Association
This is a non-notable tenant's association for a single building with only 50 members. It has a few unique Google results, but not a lot. Kjkolb 08:51, 14 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Comments only, no vote: does anyone has any clue about its notability and significance to be here. --Bhadani 17:03, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. a) It's a blatant advertisement. b) A tennant's association for a singly building has very, very little notability. If it was for a 5000 member project it might come close, but this misses that mark by a couple of orders of magnitude. --Icelight 17:48, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, important to both its members and to potential members.Gateman1997 18:36, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, the cafeteria in the building I work in is important to the people who work there, people who will work there and people who walk in off the street, and probably more people care about it than this tenants' association, but that doesn't mean it should have an article. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:56, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Icelight. Owen&times; &#9742;  20:37, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity advertisement for the association (note the use of "We"), with no reliable 3rd party sources to back it up. - Mgm|(talk) 22:20, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely unimportant to most of the 6 billion people on earth who are not members or potential members. Probable copyvio. Probably does violate WP:NOT and absolutely does violate common sense to keep this. Gamaliel 05:18, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Notable to Toronto, less so to Canada. I've only heard of them through documentaries on the notorious Regent Park. This is only a comment because secretly I would like to see it cleaned-up and stay even though it doesn't meet notability standards. If tenants associations ever do get included into Wikipedia this one should first in. --maclean25 06:31, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, your secret's out now! Mindmatrix 17:58, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable; reads like they think of Wikipedia as free web space. (Full disclosure: I can almost see Oak Street from the roof of my building. But then, I wouldn't support an article for the Winchester Square Residents Association, either.) Bearcat 08:43, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. It's an ad right now, and even if it wasn't, I don't think it merits inclusion in WP. However, if someone can re-write this to be more informative and explain its significance, I may change my vote. Mindmatrix 17:58, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertisement. Zhatt  20:36, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn --TimPope 21:11, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: This page was previously VfD'd. See Votes for deletion/220 Oak Street Tenants Association. I've removed the content, and placed a deletedpage tag on it. --Durin 17:29, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. As per Durin. / Peter Isotalo 23:00, 19 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.