Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2309


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete (unanimous). --Scimitar parley 15:43, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

2309
Not only is this a one-line stub about one minor fact about a fictional character, it's an incorrect one-line-stub about one minor fact about a fictional character, as Jean-Luc Picard says that he was born in 2305. There's no useful information to merge and the redirect would be totally worthless. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 16:08, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No scheduled events, perhaps some astronomical events but those should be in century articles if they are this far in the future. Gerrit CUTEDH 16:10, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Are you suggesting that Jean-Luc Picard's birth has been scheduled? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 16:19, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not. It should be deleted because there are no scheduled events. Gerrit CUTEDH 16:32, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 16:43, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for now unless someone can add an astronomical event or a correct fictional reference for the year. 23skidoo 18:28, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Instead of wasting servers on this, they could add the one sentence to the Star Trek page.Rhetoricalwater 18:15, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete no comment needed Masterhatch 10:42, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not worthy of a merge, but this inofrmation could be placed in a broader Star Trek article. Cool3 17:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I would have been bold and merged it myself, actually, but it's incorrect trivial information. - A Man In Black  (conspire | past ops) 21:20, 16 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.