Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2318

"According to the point-and-click series The Journeyman Project, 2318 is the projected year that that extraterrestrials land on Earth to form a permanent alliance. This is, however, entirely fictional, and most likely will never happen." This merits inclusion in 2318 if it is possible to expand it, but this bit of trivia is not worthy of its own article, and finding enough information about a year this far in the future would be impossible. Guanaco 04:34, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. And frankly, even if it wasn't in the far future, I wouldn't want to see a minor bit of fictional trivia like this in an article about a year. &mdash;Stormie 04:40, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. TPK 06:39, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. There was a precedent for this quite recently, ah yes, Votes_for_deletion/2443. --Ianb 06:44, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: fancruft. It makes my head hurt to look at all the red links in The Journeyman Project... more useless crap on the way. God save WP. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:14, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: A private fiction. The year entry is supposed to be for stuff that happens. Geogre 12:44, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with everything that has been said. Definitely delete. Skyler 18:37, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * I removed some non-encyclopedic information and simply put in encyclopedic information. True or false: now this article can re-direct to 24th century. 66.245.7.55 22:17, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Why waste the space it takes to redirect such a strange number, which could refer to any number of different subjects? I can't see people typing in this number and expecting to be redirected to information on a future century. No vote change. Make me an argument. Skyler 22:27, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * Poof. You're an argument.  :^P  Seriously, delete this.  This is just goofy. - Lucky 6.9 03:13, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge into timeline of fictional future events and delete. -Sean Curtin 21:54, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Agree, however the format of timeline of fictional future events includes links to the relevant date page. Since the author has already taken down the doubtful content, I have been bold and inserted a reasonable facsimile into the Timeline page.  Rich Farmbrough 21:16, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)