Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2362 (show)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  00:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

2362 (show)
NN. Slight vanity (not really drooling, at least), but very likely created by people behind production. "will be featured on Machinima.com, although only the teaser trailer is available at the moment." (Wikipedia is not crystal ball). --Drat (Talk) 07:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN --Ezeu 07:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. JHMM13 (T | C) 08:04, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a crystal ball. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 12:08, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Hey guys, I created this entry and, as you suspected, I am also part of the production team. I think that this article is factual and unbiased. Vanity would imply that I have boasted about the show being fantastic, or at least presented an opinion. This article is neutral in the way it has been written, merely presenting facts and useful information. This show will no doubt appear on Machinima.com, but if you feel that that sentence is not appropriate then it can be edited (after this is Wikipedia). I feel this article provides useful information for those who have seen the trailer and\or have read about the series, and would like to know who is involved, what it is about, which episodes are in production, who the characters are etc. Rather than deleting the article, we could simple add a notice such as the one at the top of the X-Men 3 page, stating that the production hasn't yet been completed and as such this information may be speculative.

If, having read this, you still feel this isn't appropriate for Wikipedia, you may remove the article.-- Unsigned comment by EvMaster


 * Comment X-Men 3 is a major studio production that follows up two very successful films about a highly-notable comic book series. Your work, however good it may or may not be, is none of those things. While it could be argued that Machinima.com is an important vehicle for your particular genre, appeareance there does not necessarily indicate notability as wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Delete-- Unsigned comment by DeathThoreau
 * Comment Don't let this whole thing discourage you, EvMaster. I'm sure you could contribute to wikipedia in other ways. As it is, it doesn't belong. If, however, it gets released, and becomes really popular (let's face it, even a tiny fraction of Red vs Blue's popularity would be quite an achievement), and has a big impact, then maybe, who knows. And remember, if your production becomes really popular, someone else may well create an article on your show.--Drat (Talk) 16:38, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable, speculative, and admitted vanity. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  16:29, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.