Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/23red


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

23red

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Suggest delete. fervent_spirit

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of RS indicates failure of GNG BlueSalix (talk) 00:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment It's covered in great detail in the specialist press. But coverage in mainstream news media is just brief mentions. You can't claim there are no reliable sources. The question is whether these go beyond routine coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment From the Guardian article "Jo Arden is head of strategy at 23red". It's all looking like press releases to me. Neonchameleon (talk) 11:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.