Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24,601


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jean Valjean. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

24,601

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The subject is not notable for being a number, rather is (minimally) notable for being a part of a work. Regardless, this article fails WP:NNUM. Previous AfD discussion is here: Articles for deletion/24601 (number) JackFromWisconsin (talk &#124; contribs) 19:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. JackFromWisconsin (talk &#124; contribs) 19:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. JackFromWisconsin (talk &#124; contribs) 19:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge literary bit to Jean Valjean, not sure if the prime factorization stuff needs to be kept or merged elsewhere, per WP:ATD. Jclemens (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. This has no great mathematical significance; any notability is purely related to Les Miserables. The factorization is irrelevant to its literary use and should not be merged elsewhere if this is deleted or merged. However, a year ago the article contained a long unsourced section of many references to the same number in other popular culture items . It was removed, but if it could be restored with proper sourcing it might be enough to provide independent-enough notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:17, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * PS See also 1138 (number), which has more or less the same issues: again, not particularly notable mathematically, but might be notable for its many pop-culture references, if they could be properly sourced. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge per Jclemens, no stand alone notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge per Jclemens - While the number itself might not be notable as a number as stated by the nom, there's a decent chance that someone may search for it due to its association with Les Miserables, thus keeping it as a Redirect would be a good WP:ATD. Rorshacma (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Jean_Valjean per the above. Valid and likely search especially as the one without the comma is a redirect to this one. Star   Mississippi  18:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.