Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2472d AF Reserve Flying Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

2472d AF Reserve Flying Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not really seeing anything notable that this unit did. There are citations, but they are mainly primarily sourced (although, there is nothing wrong with this), but it's mainly due to the lack of any credible claim to notability that I am convinced that this isn't a notable unit. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Agree with deletion. This unit was the holding organization for active duty members of the Air Force whose mission was to train reservists un the Kansas City area.  In addition, the article is misleading, the center was never assigned to Airways and Air Communications Service, it was under Air Defense Command from 1946 to 1948, then Continental Air Command.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 06:55, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:13, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.