Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/24 (soundtrack)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. Merging discussion is found at Talk:24 (2016 film). (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 07:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

24 (soundtrack)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sound Track of a general movie as other movies in Indian film industry is not notable to create to new article for the soundtracks. They can just be merges to the Movie's article section. KC Velaga ☚╣✉╠☛  14:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: Merging the soundtrack with the main article will bloat it, and the soundtrack image would violate WP:NFCC. Kailash29792 (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 09:31, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 09:32, 7 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge with the parent article. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 05:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: I think the article is the process of expansion. As the film has released, there is substantial scope of further development. Forget about the deletion, any detailed sourced information cannot be removed. Your claim "Sound Track of a general movie as other movies in Indian film industry is not notable to create to new article for the soundtracks. They can just be mentioned in the Movie's article section." seems to be just a personal view– word(s) "general movie". For more see notability of articles Arjann (talk) 07:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 *  Comment Speedy Keep - User has withdrawn deletion nom -, you have only 2500 edits to your name, so it's unclear to me whether with or not you are familiar with Wikipedia's notability criteria. If you are familiar with the notability criteria, I'd like to hear a specific argument for why you think the article does not satisfy WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG, since we need something beefier than your personal assertion that the soundtrack is not notable. If you are proposing that the content be merged, you probably should have taken a look at WP:MERGE and followed those steps instead of proposing deletion. Looking forward to your response, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it doesn't meet the notability criteria because of the the following reasons:
 * It is not a top album that is listed in country's musical charts
 * The recording has not been certified gold in any country.
 * The album has neither won nor nominated for any notable awards in
 * It is not a important subject of national broadcast or similar ones
 * There are sources but having sources alone doesn't make it notable. According to point 5 in the notability guidelines, if it is only a part of a notable film then it should merged with the parent article. KC Velaga  ☚╣✉╠☛  04:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * What about the other criteria? The subject only has to meet one criterion to pass the test. What about 1? Has it been the subject of significant discussion by reliable sources? Does it meet criterion 5? If it does, isn't the article too long to comfortably fit in the main 24 article? We're not talking about a stub here or a raw track list. Further, I'm unclear about your goal. You recently slapped a merge template on the article, but didn't start a discussion about the merge. Are you withdrawing the deletion nomination? [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb] (talk) 05:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I prefer to merge the article with the film's (24 (2016 film)) rather than deletion. I withdraw the deletion nomination with preference to merge it. KC Velaga  ☚╣✉╠☛  07:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Discuss the merge discussion at Talk:24_(2016_film) KC Velaga  ☚╣✉╠☛  00:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.