Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/268 (bus)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 16:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

268 (bus)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This does not explain why one bus service is any more notable than anything else. Qu e ntin Smith 20:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Chris Kelly, Fond user of the 268 23/09/07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.68.246.42 (talk) 20:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Keep this article its really usefull!!! i would die withoout it, you dont want your death on your conscious do ya? - Sukraaj Brench
 * KEEP IT YOU FOOLS IT IS THE MOST TRUTHFUL ARTICLE I HAVE EVER READ ON WIKI, LONG LIVE THE 268 ARTICLE, MAY IT HELP ALL THOSE WHO THOUGHT OF CATCHING IT ON A FRIDAY WHEN ITS RAINING
 * Delete No notability asserted, nor can any probably be. Dean Wormer 20:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable bus. Wikipedia is not a directory of bus stations.  Useight 21:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. -- Mike  Vitale  21:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If you miss the Heckmondwike Green bus at 1953 hrs, another one will be along in an hour. Mandsford 22:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of notability of the route, no indications that it is a major route.--JForget 22:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete What's so special about this bus route? —  Wen li  (contribs) 01:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete honestly, this article just seems a joke. There are thousands of "268 bus" around the world, are we going to list them all ? We have reached the "absolute zero" notability SyG 09:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Funny, but no.  RFerreira 04:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - obviously. Ridiculously silly. Some bus routes are notable - e.g. Outer Circle - but this is clearly not one of them. DWaterson 21:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable and misleading title, what about other 268s with much higher ridership? 132.205.44.5 23:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete It is a bus. There are thousands of them. Why is this one so important? What makes it better than 267 or 269?--65.169.203.196 15:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

@ above, it MUST be better than the 269, because that service route got taken off when thr 269 and the 269 were running virtually the same route, that a good enough reason? //Benja —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.202.83.183 (talk) 20:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, just a bus route, nothing special. J I P  | Talk 04:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Also, this discussion should be closed now.
 * Comment Well, there's still the 270, the 271, the 272,...--Gp75motorsports 13:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.