Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/28th Guam Legislature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. partially because of the lack of a compelling deletion rationale. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

28th Guam Legislature

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I think "Legislature of Guam" should be given as a subheading and also deleted. Redivy (talk) 22:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Redivy (talk) 22:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Articles like these are always notable. There is always going to be coverage of legislative sessions (as can be seen with [this query on newspapers.com, for instance) for [[WP:GNG]] purposes; I'd also argue these articles pass WP:NLIST too as a list of a group of notable people (Guam legislators pass WP:NPOL). Curbon7 (talk) 02:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 03:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: per Curbon7. There's a decent amount of coverage of the activities of this legislature, like others in different localities. Skynxnex (talk) 03:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep It's possible this isn't notable on sourcing grounds, but that argument hasn't been made, and legislatures are almost always notable. SportingFlyer  T · C  22:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.