Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2B (magazine) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 03:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

2B (magazine)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable magazine. Previous AfD was no consensus recommending speedy renominate. Lionel (talk) 23:56, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  —Lionel (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The solution suggested last time was to create an article about the publishing company, Communications Etre, which publishes three magazines, of which this is one. There's no indication that "2B" is, in itself, notable.  I don't want to repeat the obvious Hamlet's soliloquy joke, so I'll just say 2B will mean "too bad".  Mandsford 00:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Unless this magazine becomes much more influential very quickly, there's no reason for it to have its own article, nor to move it anywhere else. Chromancer (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.