Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2D 3D Animation Studio India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Scott Mac 15:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

2D 3D Animation Studio India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to establish organizational notability. Both citations provided are dead links, lacking historical archived copies; unable to verify content or notability in accordance with WP:ORG or the general notability guidelines, which require significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Cindy ( talk to me ) 12:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

First Citation Cache URL
 * Keep Citation provided is dead currently but i searched the google for that link and successfully found its cached on Google search here is the URL for cache. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohdnaved (talk • contribs)
 * Keep It is supported by WikiProject Animation, WikiProject India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohdnaved (talk • contribs)
 * Keep I saw Animation Studio List that list is very long but detail information about most of the studios as a separate page on wiki is missing, so i think under the Wiki Project Animation we must be fair with this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohdnaved (talk • contribs) 13:25, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It is supported by WikiProject Animation, WikiProject India This is a poor argument. Those tags simply mean that the article's topic is relevant to animation and India, not whether it is notable. Especially when you, user:Mohdnaved, the creator of the article, added those tags. Chris857 (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Additionally, Mohd, this is the third time you have created this article, without addressing the issues brought forward with previous creations. Again, Wikipedia is not the place to create articles merely to promote your own organization. If your organization is truly notable, kindly wait until someone without a conflict of interest is willing to create an article for you, which meet the guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Cindy  ( talk to me ) 15:47, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No assertion of notability per WP:Company, can't find any significant coverage of the company online from WP:Reliable sources. Darth Sitges (talk) 14:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Don't vote multiple times. At the first glance I thought three people have voted for "Keep" Can you show at least one news article coverage or review? No, problem if it is in Indian language newspapers.--Tito Dutta (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep This article is not orphan, as i saw that List of animation studio is linking to this page.
 * Comment Most of the news and content in India is never published online, I recently saw a company who came up with an IPO in india but on whole google hardly 3 pages were pointing to it..So i dont expect much online references for most of the mediocre companies in india. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.220.135 (talk) 17:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I have heard about that company in Delhi..being a graphic designer i know its a branded name in the industry. Source : Personal experience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.109.202.121 (talk) 16:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 *  Strong Keep Notability does not mean online references, most of the content in asia pacific region is not online. Companies with Millions of revenue annually and substantial market share generally have a single website online and not much online reference. I did some local search engine searches and thus suggest a strong keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.98.25.232 (talk) 06:05, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment One of the reference which was earlier dead, is working now. It again shows that in India not much importance is given to online presence by majority of the companies, thus finding an online reference is not very easy and suitable for most of the Indian mid size companies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohdnaved (talk • contribs) 12:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, references do not establish notability. Hairhorn (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.