Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2MASS 0036+1821


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

2MASS 0036+1821

 * – ( View AfD View log  0036+1821 Stats )

Not notable per WP:NASTRO. No references, no claims to notability. Regards— ~    The In fi     ni te     S p a c e     X    19:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Criterion 3 of WP:NASTRO recognizes notability if there is non-trivial coverage of an astronomical object in multiple published works. I searched NASA's Astrophysics Data System for mentions of this star in the academic literature, and to my surprise, I found that it is mentioned by name in the abstracts of 9 separate papers. I must confess that I haven't read these papers, but it is clear from their abstracts that this object has received non-trivial coverage in multiple journal articles. Thus, it passes WP:NASTRO. Here is my search query, along with the results. Astro4686 (talk) 04:53, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is quite clearly non-trivial coverage of the subject. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.