Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2MASS J03504284+1716594


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

2MASS J03504284+1716594

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not remotely notable. Comprehensively fails WP:NASTRO. No claims to notability made in the article. Lithopsian (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: no significant coverage. Praemonitus (talk) 21:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: SIMBAD contains only 1 reference to this source, and it's a big catalog paper. So, this definitely fails WP:NASTRO. Aldebarium (talk) 19:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly Redirect: I agree that we should probably delete it, as per Praemomitus and Aldebarium. However, a redirect to List of stars in Taurus may also be possible. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 11:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: Nothing special about this star. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.