Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2U (Keshia Chante song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2U (album).  MBisanz  talk 02:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

2U (Keshia Chante song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Listing at AfD to canvass opinions, but this would be appropriate as a redirect to 2U (album) as R from song. f e  minist  02:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  f  e  minist  02:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose it charted, is it being deleted because of David Guetta? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I would recommend finding additional sources that show that this song has received a significant amount of coverage if you want to have a stronger argument to keep this. Charting is definitely a start, but it was not covered by several notable, third-party sources, then the information on the single's existence and commercial performance can easily be folded into the parent article. I am not sure what you were getting at with the David Guetta question tbh. Aoba47 (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Oppose – Given that it charted in the top 20 in Canada 10 years ago, this article does have notability and it should be expanded, not deleted. 76.116.198.27 (talk) 12:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose, I feel like this is just a way to say that the David Guetta song is a primary topic songwise. Either way, the song charted in Canada at #14 (not to mention that Canada is Bieber's home country), so that proves that the song received appropriate success to have an article on Wikipedia. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:8BB:55F:E0BA:1473 (talk) 20:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2U (album) as suggested by the nominator. While this song has charted, I cannot find enough coverage in third-party, reliable sources that support its notability outside of the album. The information about its chart appearance can easily be put into the article on the album itself. If the voters above me can link me to a few references that have significant coverage on this song, I will change my vote. Aoba47 (talk) 20:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per nominator. While charting is one of the criteria for meeting WP:NSONG, that only means it may be notable. Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.