Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 Geez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. A7 or G11, take your pick really. -- Steel 12:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

2 Geez

 * — (View AfD)

Promotion for somebody's YouTube video, but it contains a claim of notability ("world-renowned"), so here we are at AFD. Non-notable video by non-notable people. FreplySpang 07:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC) This is actually very popular in certain parts of Western Washington, so I think it should stay. These two individuals have created an impressive feat with this video. I heard about it before seeing the article, so that says something. -Grant Leslie
 * Speedy delete as non-notable web content, no WP:RS, is WP:COI and probably WP:NFT. Assertion of notability is spurrious at best, and WP:IAR seems to apply. -- Kinu t /c  07:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Non-notable Youtube video. GCFreak2 09:24, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, and so tagged. Charlie 09:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - unremarkable webcontent. MER-C 09:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.