Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 The Ranting Gryphon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedied repost. Opabinia regalis 04:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

2 The Ranting Gryphon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The page offers no sources and does not assert notability of the subject.
 * Also, when the first comment on the talk page described the subject as "irrelevant", that comment was deleted by another editor; this is vandalism to prevent application of Wikipedia polices. Avt tor 22:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable outside Furry Fandom. Also, as Avt tor pointed out, the page does not cite any sources. --Efitu (Tlk Unc) 00:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Previously deleted (log) under the title 2 the Ranting Gryphon. The content looks similar. GreenReaper 00:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, G4. A direct copy of the WikiFur article, which was previously deleted. A good article isn't inconceivable, but it would require someone to actually write a new article rather than copying text from WikiFur, which has different notability policies than Wikipedia. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 00:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Fascinating, I was wondering why the talk page said "glad to see this page back" when there was nothing in the deletion log. I would have proposed this earlier if I'd known. I put a Notability template on the page a month ago in the hopes of eliciting some relevant sources. Avt tor 01:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * regreatably, speedy delete as recreation of deleted material. Though I continue to maintain that he's a notable topic, recreating copy-pasted material that was previously deleted is not the way to change consensus. Wintermut3 04:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)