Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2 tuners

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:39, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

2 tuners
I didn't think it was speedy material... but definitely not worth under this title. gren グレン 02:40, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I never heard any "formal" term for this while developing set-top boxes. Gazpacho 03:16, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm afraid it's got just enough context to avoid speedy, but there's no real hope for this as an article.  Besides, dual tuners are for Picture-In-Picture, not watch-and-record.  My DVR box is very specifically one tuner: I can watch and record separately.  What I can't do is record two things at once. &mdash; Lomn | Talk 06:04:35, 2005-08-19 (UTC)
 * certainly two tuners are necessary to record and view different programmes, nothing to do with picture-in-picture. james gibbon  22:50, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not the formal term, as stated above. Cnwb 12:17, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Dottore So 14:05, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not really separate article material. james gibbon  22:50, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above --Aqua 00:11, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Set-top box or Personal video recorder. -- Chuq 12:55, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Personal video recorder seems a suitable solution -- Graibeard 07:57, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.