Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2espn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

2espn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is one of those 'this could be a sentence in a another article' articles which has outlived its purpose; it's about a texting short code to get scores and news from ESPN in the past. Now, it doesn't work (I tried the code; my shout disappeared into the ether, and is in fact now owned by Buca di Beppo, so you're not scoring anything but Italian food from it), and sports scores are just available from an app and Google and countless other sources on a phone. Only one source which has long expired and just redirects to a 'download the ESPN app' link, and no incoming links; like my past PROD for ESPN Now (a PPV barker channel), this is yet another ESPN service that lost its purpose and should have never been an article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. No notability shown. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete Non-notable former service. WikiVirusC (talk) 15:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any references on this. The archive link in the article doesn't even work for me, but even if it did, primary sources aren't be sufficient.  --Hirsutism (talk) 22:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.