Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2fold20 play


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   soft delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:05, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

2fold20 play

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Company does not appear to be notable. While there are sources, and they discuss the company...the only reason the company is covered is because they happened (by chance) to be the 50th company opened in a UK business initiative. It is the 50th company being opened that is covered (the opening attracted UK Prime Ministers); had this been the 49th company opened, there is no evidence that they would have received any coverage in reliable sources. Essentially, they're attempting to inherit notability from the business park. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:38, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: the original creator also created TwoFoldTwenty at the same time; today it was redirected to 2fold20 play; if this is deleted, the redirect with history should probably be deleted as well. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Coverage is not about 2fold20 play, it's just a news event about Birmingham Science Park getting a new company. Lacks coverage asked for by WP:CORPDEPTH. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.