Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2greendollars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Essentially a recreation of material deleted in a previous AFD discussion. CSD G4. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

2greendollars

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet Notability guidelines on most, if not all, counts. Has been previously deleted three times under Anthony_Chidiac. User:Avatera also almost certainly a sock puppet of User:Achidiac due to similar claims on user page of Avatera and Early Life section of 2greendollars article. Closest overhead (talk) 10:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as re-creation of previously deleted material. The text here is very similar to the last deleted versions (Articles for deletion/Anthony Chidiac, Articles for deletion/Anthony Chidiac (2nd nomination), Articles for deletion/Anthony Chidiac (3rd nomination), in the same style laced with puffery; the only substantial change has been the movement of external links to footnotes.  So tagging.  Recommend salting this and all other variants of the names.  Note also that prior discussions featured busy sockpuppets. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. I didn't see any links on Google and Yahoo showing that this person has achieved notability. SwisterTwister   talk  20:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.