Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd Avenue (TV channel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Solar Entertainment Corporation. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

2nd Avenue (TV channel)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

another page subject to a slow-motion long duration edit war in regards to notability and whether it should be a standalone article or a redirect Taking Out The Trash (talk) 03:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines.  Just ' i ' yaya  04:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to Solar Entertainment Corporation. There are good materials out there for the channel like the carriage dispute between Solar and SkyCable. However, I can't justify its claim on notability as the second-highest earning channel within its parent company as enough to warrant a standalone article. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect and salt: to Solar Entertainment Corporation, please protect the article until GNG has been found. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 12:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: I found some reliable sources about the defunct channel, its programming and events:, , , , , , and . That said, though the article needs a bit more expansion, it's good enough to pass WP:GNG.  ASTIG️🎉  (HAPPY 2023) 00:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * All those references you linked are regurgitated press releases without the journalists/authors writing them, some even have a direct "sponsored content" tag or a flat out promotion at the end. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Solar Entertainment Corporation, not convinced by the The Philippine Star references above at all. While it's obviously a reliable source, after reading these it's quite clear it's not the independent coverage of the channel. Otherwise, my searches bring up passing mentions, listings, Fandom + blogs and unrelated results. Fails WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.