Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2suit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 14:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

2suit

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability WP:N. Not in the slightest. Firelement85 07:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Unfortunately, this isn't the only such article that has cropped up. Michaelbusch 07:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Sex in space Colonel Warden 08:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Redundantbot 00:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Doubt it's even notable enough to be merged into the the Sex in space page.Alberon 09:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep  definitely notable and noted; if Merged, merge with Sex in space. Redundantbot 08:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)  (note: Alberon above appears to be SPA?)
 * Comment How is the 2suit notable? The creator isn't notable, if Wikipedia included all of the gadgets that people came up with, whether they are real or a figment of someones imagination this wouldn't be an encyclopedia which it strives to be. 2suit should not be merged with Sex in space, it does have a section popular culture however 2suit will fit only a handful of people's definition of popular culture. I also take issue on Alberon's behalf about being called a SPA, from an account with only 19 edits, don't mistake a red name for SPA.Firelement85 09:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply Per your comment, your AfD request appears to be governed by a subjective personal opinion (violating WP:N guidelines) about the notability creator of this 2suit, which isn't the subject or article. I am new here and did mistake a red name for an SPA. No need to get offensive about the number of my edits, hopefully they've been a contribution. It meets notability guidelines, there is objective evidence it meets the criteria because it has received significant coverage from secondary and tertiary sources.


 * Comment: btw I first read about the 2Suit in OUTSIDE Magazine last year. Found the source and updated the newspapers listed here. Redundantbot 01:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Is a descriptive topic, not an advert, and sourced. Mbisanz 23:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.