Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2wenty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  21:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

2wenty

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

dubious notability. Can find virtually no coverage by reliable sources, seems to exist only to promote the subject  F ASTILY   20:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Photography,  and California.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I am not finding any RS in a WP:BEFORE. --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 01:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not pass WP:NARTIST or WP:GNG. All I'm finding in a BEFORE search are primary sources, user-submitted content, hyper-local coverage and the like, rather than SIGCOV in reliable sources. Netherzone (talk) 01:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Same as above. I am not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources, just blogs and the like. The best thing I found was this brief item from Wired but that is just a single, short source, far less than there has been for other articles that have been deleted. Elspea756 (talk) 02:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Found nothing. Timur9008 (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.