Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3007WFP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous! | Talk 21:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

3007WFP
A very particular brand of computer monitor. "The 3007WFP's large size and high resolution, combined with its great specifications and features, and stunning image quality, make it an excellent choice for any application, including design, editing, 3D production, video production, watching movies, and gaming. The monitor is highly affordable compared to other monitors with the same, or similar specifications" .... and so on. I half-wondered whether this is commercial spam, but on second thoughts doubt it. Either way, it really has to go, doesn't it? TheGrappler 02:06, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete Notability not present (Johnny Copper 15:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC))
 * delete An advertisement, not an encyclopedia article. Itsameanick 08:12, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete --Stephane Charette 08:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete advertisement, as such POV issues. Also, I doubt the notability to begin with.  Cool3 21:13, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable Computerjoe 's talk 20:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. incog 21:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. - XX55XX 22:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Delete' Stunningly unimpressive spamvertisement. Santtus 21:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 12:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge to Dell monitors and make it sound a lot less like an advertisement. I wasn't sure that particular models of Dell hardware were noteworthy, but since there's a category and a general article, that approach would work.  --Elkman 15:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as an advertisement —M e ts501 talk 16:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Copyviolation tag Added, Speedy Delete copied straight off another website, reads like an advertisement.-- Andeh 18:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Answers.com is a Wikipedia fork. Therefore, identical pages on answers.com do not indicate anyone has violated copyright. The Land 19:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.