Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/300watches


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 19:57, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

300watches

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Trade PR puffery, non notable corporation asserting just enough notability for CSD to be declined. Fiddle  Faddle  16:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Clearly non-notable. Just an Ebay seller with 5000 sales (I've seen plenty with far far more) --Rushton2010 (talk) 17:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete Owner of the company is member of the International Watch and Jewelry Guild (IWJG), World Wide Traders, and the National Association of Watch and Clock Collectors. That makes the portal itself important. --snehilsharma
 * Speedy delete—CSD A7. Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 20:59, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete bordering on WP:ADVERT. LibStar (talk) 00:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The article is not forcing any one in terms of promotion just name of brand, past history and media. In future it will be having elements of social responsibility.--snehilsharma

In the nut shell, future of the article will be as equal as articles of other web portals like Facebook, twitter and many others.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.