Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30LL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  10:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

30LL

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable spam? -- Big Brother 1984 05:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN, seems to be promotional. janejellyroll 05:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Seems to be promotional to me too. Delete Anonymous

I do not see the ads in this entry, definitely a keeper. METALLICAH


 * How is it different from other podcast entries such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engadget_Podcast ? Amasoussou


 * comment whether or not this is notable is perhaps questionable, but this is written from a neutral perspective and does not appear to be spam. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 18:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral - I don't think this can be classified as spam (it's just descriptive). However, notability may be an issue--but one I'm not commenting on except to say that it has a low Alexa rating of >6,000,000.  Whether this rating is really meaningful is another issue which I won't go into.  Thus, I remain neutral.  -- Black Falcon 02:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Amasoussou 11:00, 11 February 2007 (EST)
 * Keep - It is definitely not spam and I think we all agree on that one (as a side note, I'm Lebanese and have listened to those guys' podcasts and interviews, no spam detected anywhere). The article is appropriate for wikipedia and does not bypass any of the requirements. Not having a high Alexa rating is not an indicator of genuineness anyways. Objectively and through some common sense, this article is valid and should add value to the wealth of wikipedia and should be treated no different than some very valid entries as / My two cents. 30LL is another idiom and the article explains that with the source behind it. Gentlemen, we've got a keep. -- METALLICAH 23:35, 10 Febryar7 2007 (EST)
 * Neutral, doesn't appear to be spam. But only 22 results from google does make me wonder about its notability. Mathmo Talk 10:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - There seems to be consensus on the fact that this is not spam. In regard to notability, 30LL is the first result of about 999,000 for a Google search on "Lebanese Podcasts"


 * Keep - I don't see anything wrong with the entry, it's objectively writen and the site is quite popular User:Anonymous 23:00 EST, 11 February 2007
 * Delete Few hits and even fewer editors. Rkevins 08:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article seems to be objectively written, and accurately describes the website and its features. There doesn't seem to be any promotional material in the article and therefore I don't think it can be considered as spam. Regarding notability, 30ll.org seems to be a respected web media outlet in the online Lebanese community. I would also note that its podcast is rather unique and that its format is somewhat of a first in the field of Lebanese and Arab media. I say keep it. -- Kartrab 22:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - If every podcast would have it's own Wikipedia page, that would fill the site with irrelevant blogs and podcasts, etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.198.28.232 (talk) 02:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC).

This popular podcast concept is pioneer and is picking up steam extremely fast. Key podcasts and blogs actually do have wikipedia entries. This is no different. METALLICAH 16:42, 14 February 2007 (EST).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.