Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30 Even Scarier Movie Moments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Redirect to The 100 Scariest Movie Moments. While reporting on a particular list, even a subjective one is not original research there is consensus that this program does not need its own article but can be covered in the article on the original show. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

30 Even Scarier Movie Moments

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There are no refs demonstrating its notability. Do we really need this? The list isn't even there. Also nominating the sister article with more of them. Szzuk (talk) 20:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Also nominated: The 100 Scariest Movie Moments


 * Delete - Even scariest sez even who? Original research. Carrite (talk) 00:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and Carrite. Please let me know when we get to 15 Scarier Than Scariest And Even Scarier Movie Moments - frankieMR (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Both articles have been trimmed and now focus on the shows that bear these names, so it becomes and issue of notability. I'll try to research on it, and I am neutral in the meantime - frankieMR (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notability is borderline but it exists, and the content is encyclopaedic - frankieMR (talk) 22:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to 'The 100 Scariest Movie Moments were this topic has contextual mention. Again, and with respects to User:Carrite, a documentary film consisting of its production staff's assesment of scarey moments, is not a violation of Wikipedia's instruction addressing editor's original research.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:58, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect, per above. An argument could be made for a weak keep, but a redirect seems the better way to go.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * My thought as well. If more becomes available to flesh out and source this, it might be recreated.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.