Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30 Kenmore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   SOFTDELETE. J04n(talk page) 18:14, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

30 Kenmore

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

notability questioned, non-referenced Allamericanbear (talk) 03:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  04:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  04:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

* Delete Starting with unsourced material, and ending with non-factual content. Route "30 Kenmore" operated as route "30-Ontario", beginning in approximately 1939 as a bus route through a primarily residential section on the North Buffalo/Kenmore city/town border. Very little makes this notable, especially compared to other NFTA-Metro routes. --Allamericanbear (talk) 07:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (jaw)  @ 15:36, 22 November 2014 (UTC)



* DELETE. Confusion on why this needs to be relisted again. Are there not valid reasons already? A little further digging shows that this user has had numerous non-referenced, non-notable articles, previously. I've watched other potential articles be deleted for less reason. --Allamericanbear (talk) 16:09, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * you can't !vote twice so I've struck both your !votes, Also we don't delete on 1 !vote and especially not on !votes done by nom. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as no evidence of notability . – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:39, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


 * So a misunderstanding of voting procedures strikes both votes? Please watch for my contributions...you'll see any more.--Allamericanbear (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.