Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/316th division


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closing as Keep with nominator agreeing. Peridon (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

316th division

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly written article. No references, no categories. Doesn't really have enough meaningful information for the user to do anything with it. I submitted this to CSD but the CSD was denied and it was suggested that it be submitted through AFD instead. Kumioko (talk) 11:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep AFD is not cleanup. User:Fram has demonstrated the correct procedure by following our editing policy and expanding the article from its first faltering start - kudos. Warden (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: - This article had been deleted through the CSD process and Fram is going to extraordinary measures to expand the article and ensure its worth keeping. I have no problem with this AFD being closed if someone else agrees. Kumioko (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.